Skip to main content

Team Blog #2

Team Blog #2
September 18, 2019

COMPLETED:

This week, the team came together to discuss the direction we would take regarding the small scale project. Currently, our idea for the project was to make improvements on the track that had already been built, along with refining the controls and bogie to get it all to work properly. However, after discussing with Mr. Swenson about alternate ideas that he had to the project, we debated on taking a different direction by building even smaller tracks made from laser cut material.

PROBLEMS:

There are several problems with both the options that we have discussed. Originally, the small scale track as seen in Figure 1 was created from last years small scale team. This design has many imperfections, but we already know all of them. Of course, with all those defects there must be some type of solution, but the problem with that in itself is figuring out which part to focus on first: bogie, controls, or track?


Figure 1. Small Scale Track 
Figure 2. Alternative track

Figure 2 represents the alternate idea that we had pitched to us by Mr. Swenson. By discarding the problems from the track and sticking with an alternative design for the small scale guideway, we could focus more on the bogies and controls. There has already been designs and progress for this small scale track, but the only downside is that it would be hard to realistically scale up in the future.

We approached Professor Furman about both topics, and he gave us significant advice on how we should decide on what steps to take next. 

NEXT STEPS:

we will be holding a meeting over the weekend to further discuss the final approach we will take for the Small Scale Project. Once we have decided what path to take, we will then create a Gantt Chart and presentation, begin designing ideas using CAD and other software, as well as creating a bill of materials for future reference.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Team Blog #21

SSST Blog 4/15/2020 During this week's class meeting, all teams met with prof Furman to discuss the engineering ethics assignment. We had a very thoughtful discussion as a class in answering ethical questions about the Boeing 737 disaster and how engineers could have prevented it, by applying the engineering ethics. We discussed that three main engineering ethics were violated; the Fundamental canon, the Informed Consent, and the precautionary principle. We also discussed the best solution to take as an engineer if you found a problem at work that will have the potential to put people's lives in danger. After the discussion was over, we had some time as a team to discuss the progress of our work. Last week, the team presented their second presentation of the semester, and a lot of progress was done. The team went over the tasks that were a little behind and discussed how we will approach simulating our work using softwares like Solidworks. For bogie: Julio was able...

Team Blog #15

Progress for this week: Controls Team: To become more familiar with the Pixy Cam several tests were conducted throuhgout the week. After the team decided to switch over to barcodes for the stations the team saw that this method was better. A sheet of the 10 barcodes was then printed out and the team tested how accurate the pixy cam was at ientifying the different codes. The team will is now working on trying to develop a test which will incorporate the arduino along with the other electrical componenets. Figure 1: Barcode recognition by Pixy2 Guideway Team: The guideway team made progress on determining how the track will be supported and what materials we will use to build it. The team setteled on using mdf wood with a thickness of .25". The laser cutter cuts the wood accurately and precisely at the maker space, however, the space is only available during the week days from 10am to 6pm. The supporting stands will use 3ft long zinc threaded rods with nots and washers to ...

Team Blog #11

SSST Blog 10/17/19 Progress for the week: Controls Team  This week for the controls team, Asmaa continued working on combining the two main Arduino codes which we have so far. One of the codes was the one which implemented the ultrasonic sensor to get the motor to slow down if the ultrasonic sensor detected an object too close to it. This mimics what we want the bogies and pods to do once they are fully operational, it is essentially collision prevention system to where if a pod gets too close to another pod, the ultrasonic sensors will detect the proximity, and get the motor to slow down. The other Arduino code which we have is for the BLE. Using a pre mad app to test if the BLE works, Asmaa wrote a code to enable the Arduino to turn an LED on and off depending on the input of the user on the app. If we typed 1, the LED would turn on and if we typed 0, the LED would turn off. Asmaa combined both of these codes into one, with the slight difference that once we have our own iO...