Skip to main content

Team Blog #1

Contact Info:

Name
Phone Number
Email
Asmaa Darwish
(408)-442-9922
asmaa98darwish@gmail.com
Justin Ghieuw
(510) 676-6681
j.ghieuw@gmail.com
Julio de Pereda Banda
(951)-587-7763
chargers1756@gmail.com
Shane Fatehi 
(408)-306-3044
shane.fatehi@gmail.com
Lissette Romero
(831)-241-3912
lizzie6879@gmail.com

Availability:

Scope of Work and Goals:
This year, the small scale teams scope of work is to:
- Develop a sustainable and efficient manufacturing process for the railway
- Design a railway that is repeatable and interchangeable
- Redesign bogie and railway (specifically at the y-junction) so that there is no risk of failure at the y-junction
- Design a bogey with the necessary sensors/electrical hardware which will allow for multiple pods to be on the railway at the same time without the risk of collision
- Possibly develop an app to be able to communicate back and forth with the bogies from users mobile device

The main goal is to build from prior years small scale designs and make the small scale model as reliable, efficient, and secure as possible. Another main goal would be to have the small scale model be able to be replicated as closely as possible to the half and full-scale model. This is something that has been lacking in the past years, however, it is a very important part of the project as a whole, especially in the long term when the full scale is actually ready to be built.

Written by: Julio de Pereda Banda





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Team Blog #11

SSST Blog 10/17/19 Progress for the week: Controls Team  This week for the controls team, Asmaa continued working on combining the two main Arduino codes which we have so far. One of the codes was the one which implemented the ultrasonic sensor to get the motor to slow down if the ultrasonic sensor detected an object too close to it. This mimics what we want the bogies and pods to do once they are fully operational, it is essentially collision prevention system to where if a pod gets too close to another pod, the ultrasonic sensors will detect the proximity, and get the motor to slow down. The other Arduino code which we have is for the BLE. Using a pre mad app to test if the BLE works, Asmaa wrote a code to enable the Arduino to turn an LED on and off depending on the input of the user on the app. If we typed 1, the LED would turn on and if we typed 0, the LED would turn off. Asmaa combined both of these codes into one, with the slight difference that once we have our own iO...

Team Blog #6

SSST Blog 10/17/19 Progress for the week: Controls Team  This weeks progress was similar to last weeks. The controls team focused on two separate tasks. Lissette and Asmaa continued to develop the test code for the motor and ultrasonic sensors. The purpose of this code is to simulate what would happen if two bogies get too close to one another, in which case the ultrasonic sensors would detect this and slow down the motor of the bogie that is getting too close to the other bogie. There were some issues with the code last week, so this week kinks were continued to be worked out. A snippet of the Arduino code can be seen below in figure 1: Figure 1: Snippet of code to control motor speed using ultrasonic sensor  The space where the small scale team works was also searched for useful components. While Lissette and Asmaa were working on this, I (Julio) was working on the iOS app. So far I am just learning the basics of the programming language Swift by watching courses ...

Team Blog #13

Blog 2/6/2020 Progress for this week: Controls Team: The iPhone application code is being developed to work with a Bluetooth module. During this process other BLE modules are being considered as well. A bench model that includes all of the electronic components is also in the works. Once this is completed, the electronics will be integrated into the bogie for further testing.  Guideway Team: The original plan was to waterjet the unused plywood in the Superway Design Center; however, plans have slightly changed. We will be using a laser cutter instead of waterjet to manufacture components of the guideway. The laser cutter in the Makerspace is more accessible and does not require supervision during use. On the other hand, the waterjet requires supervision by staff members when they are available. To speed manufacturing, laser cutter as shown in Figure 1 was determined to be most efficient. Figure 1. Laser cutter in Makerspace. Figure 2. Plywood from Design Center cut b...