Skip to main content

Team Blog #1

By
Contact Info:

Name
Phone Number
Email
Asmaa Darwish
(408)-442-9922
asmaa98darwish@gmail.com
Justin Ghieuw
(510) 676-6681
j.ghieuw@gmail.com
Julio de Pereda Banda
(951)-587-7763
chargers1756@gmail.com
Shane Fatehi 
(408)-306-3044
shane.fatehi@gmail.com
Lissette Romero
(831)-241-3912
lizzie6879@gmail.com

 Availability:

Scope of Work and Goals:
This year, the small scale teams scope of work is to:
- Develop a sustainable and efficient manufacturing process for the railway
- Design a railway that is repeatable and interchangeable
- Redesign bogie and railway (specifically at the y-junction) so that there is no risk of failure at the y-junction
- Design a bogey with the necessary sensors/electrical hardware which will allow for multiple pods to be on the railway at the same time without the risk of collision
- Possibly develop an app to be able to communicate back and forth with the bogies from users mobile device

The main goal is to build from prior years small scale designs and make the small scale model as reliable, efficient, and secure as possible. Another main goal would be to have the small scale model be able to be replicated as closely as possible to the half and full-scale model. This is something that has been lacking in the past years, however, it is a very important part of the project as a whole, especially in the long term when the full scale is actually ready to be built.

Written by: Julio de Pereda Banda

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Team Blog #11

By
SSST Blog 10/17/19 Progress for the week: Controls Team  This week for the controls team, Asmaa continued working on combining the two main Arduino codes which we have so far. One of the codes was the one which implemented the ultrasonic sensor to get the motor to slow down if the ultrasonic sensor detected an object too close to it. This mimics what we want the bogies and pods to do once they are fully operational, it is essentially collision prevention system to where if a pod gets too close to another pod, the ultrasonic sensors will detect the proximity, and get the motor to slow down. The other Arduino code which we have is for the BLE. Using a pre mad app to test if the BLE works, Asmaa wrote a code to enable the Arduino to turn an LED on and off depending on the input of the user on the app. If we typed 1, the LED would turn on and if we typed 0, the LED would turn off. Asmaa combined both of these codes into one, with the slight difference that once we have our own iO...
Post a Comment
Read more

Team Blog #25

By
SSST Blog 5/13/20 Progress for the week: Since this is essentially the last blog for the 2019/2020 academic year, and the last major thing that was accomplished this week was submitting the report, there is not that much individual subteam work that was completed. Rather, everyone came together to work on the final report throughout the entirety of the last week. The remainder of this blog will be dedicated to showcasing the final results through images of each of the subteams and also of the Small-Scale as a whole. Controls Team  The final design of the controls team was two separate iOS apps, one allowing to connect and to send data to BLEs to activate the master Arduino code and another solely for a pleasant and informative UI experience. Although ultimately a keyboard was not able to be implemented successfully into the BLE testing app, a slider was added so that depending on its position, different 8-bit unsigned integer values (within a range specified in Xcode) can be ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Team Blog #13

By
Blog 2/6/2020 Progress for this week: Controls Team: The iPhone application code is being developed to work with a Bluetooth module. During this process other BLE modules are being considered as well. A bench model that includes all of the electronic components is also in the works. Once this is completed, the electronics will be integrated into the bogie for further testing.  Guideway Team: The original plan was to waterjet the unused plywood in the Superway Design Center; however, plans have slightly changed. We will be using a laser cutter instead of waterjet to manufacture components of the guideway. The laser cutter in the Makerspace is more accessible and does not require supervision during use. On the other hand, the waterjet requires supervision by staff members when they are available. To speed manufacturing, laser cutter as shown in Figure 1 was determined to be most efficient. Figure 1. Laser cutter in Makerspace. Figure 2. Plywood from Design Center cut b...
Post a Comment
Read more